Anthony Martin’s Weblog

A blog about some guy. 
Filed under

Faith

 

The Foot Book

Karen told me she read "The Foot Book" to Hannah months ago.  As result, Hannah, who is almost three, can now tell the difference between her left foot and her right foot.

Tonight, Hannah asked me to read this book to her for the first time.  I am astounded to see how silly this book is.  How she picked up such a useful piece of information is completely beyond my ability to reason!  Here's a video of me reading the book with comments about left feet and right feet at the end:



I then cryptically reference Jonah Chapter 4 at the very end of the video.  To me, this information take together is an indictment to Christians.  Children most certainly do qualify as worthy to receive the Gospel.  But they are largely ignored.  Usually, Christians claim children are "under the age of accountability" but if God was so willing to destroy Nineveh though it contained those who could not tell their left from their right, what does that say about children who can?  Maybe I'm taking things too literally.

Fact is, I am a Christian.  I largely do not believe in this "under the age of accountability" stuff.  If we are to "become as a little child" then I would like to become as Hannah and love Christ.  Then be judged rightly.

Thus, it seems like any age of accountability is perhaps two and under.  Which means we have been mislead by most pastors in the church.  What else are they wrong about?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Epistemology   Faith   Ministry   Review   Theology  

Comments [3]

Hannah Never Cried Wolf

A few nights ago, I told Hannah the story of the boy who cried wolf.  She has been claiming that her tummy hurts right when we ask her to finish eating her dinner.  She realized she can get out of eating what's on her plate that way.  So we've started to doubt her.

I used the standard telling of the fable.  I told her about a bored shepherd boy who entertained himself by calling out "Wolf!"  Nearby villagers who came to his rescue found that the alarms were false and that they had wasted their time.  When the boy was actually confronted by a wolf, the villagers did not believe his cries for help and the wolf ate the boy.  I don't know why, but in my telling of the story, the wolf ignored the sheep, but that's how I told it to her.

After I told Hannah the story, she looked at me with wide eyes and asked, "The wolf ate Jesus?"

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Fail   Faith   Home Front  

Comments [2]

Senator Wright argues for the budget package

Watch this mental patient:



Senator Wright, STOP SPENDING.  You are not a moderate.  You are just a mental patient and you're off your meds.  Your sob stories do not alter the reality that all economies are contracting.  All economies are shrinking and you want to expand $47 billion more?  Actually, you want to spend $100 billion more because that's how you roll.

On top of that, you invoke the name of Jesus to vote for this politically centered budget?  That's pure blasphemy, Senator Wright!

Jesus would not recommend that we rely upon the government take care of people.  If people are suffering, it is the responsibility of the person, family, neighbor, and the local community who should be there, not a centralized bloated bureaucracy with mental issues.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   California   Economic   Faith   Local   Political   Video  

Comments [0]

TEDTalks - The art of baking bread - Peter Reinhart (2008)

Check out this episode of TEDTalks at The art of baking bread - Peter Reinhart (2008).
 

 
Peter really takes bread seriously.
 
Sent from my iPhone

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Faith   History   How To   Presentation   Video  

Comments [0]

Mark Driscoll's Valentine Interview on CNN

There was an interview on CNN between Darryl Lynn "D.L." Hughley and Mark Driscoll.  Here's a frame I snapped right after Mark told a joke:



And here's a link to the interview:

http://theresurgence.com/pastor_mark_driscoll_on_cnn

Learn more ...

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Christology   Faith   Ministry   Reformed   Video  

Comments [0]

Barack Obama is the minister of God

This is totally tongue-in-cheek, but bare with me for a second:
 
Let every American Citizens be subject unto Barack Obama. For there is no Barack Obama but of God: the Barack Obama that be are ordained of God.  American Citizens who therefore resisteth Barack Obama, resisteth the ordinance of God: and American Citizens that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.  For Barack Obama is not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of Barack Obama? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:  For Barack Obama is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for Barack Obama beareth not the sword in vain: for Barack Obama is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.  Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.  For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for Barack Obama is God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.  Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

I know Paul was writing to Christians who were being ruled by Rome.  But Rome conquered the nations of that day.  Today, our government supposedly derives its power from the consent of the governed.

So if you really believe the above passage, maybe you should read my explanation as to why the above interpretation is utterly false.  Here's another one:

American Citizens, be subject to Barack Obama with all fear; not only to the good Barack Obama and gentle Barack Obama, but also to the froward Barack Obama.  For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully.

In the King James Version, "froward" means "harsh" or "bad."  So really?  Is that right?  Is that what God wants?

I say no.  If you apply these passages to our illustrious leaders, you are making a mistake.  God was not referring to Barack Obama nor George Bush.  If they were worthy of homage, that's one thing.  But these cats are not.  God was talking about something else entirely.

So what are we going to do about it?  I am not commanded to render dues or tributes (taxes) to pay for abortions and torture.  And yes, I think abortions and torture will continue under Obama just like Bush did (note here that under Bush the "pro-lifer," $2.2 billion in federal funds were given to Planned Parenthood).

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Faith   Political  

Comments [0]

End Times Drivel

Spurgeon was cautious that prophecy, when misused, would be a detriment to the proclamation of the gospel; that it was foolish at best, and wicked at worst, to delve into such speculation.  Yet in Spurgeon's day, like today, silly arguments over things like the number of the feasts, beast, and the identity of the anti-christ were topics of deep discussion.

During his ministry there was a great deal of prophetic speculation that Jesus would return in the year 1866.  When Christ did not return in that year, the very thing Spurgeon feared began to happen.  Unbelievers began to ridicule all Christian preaching.  Regarding this Spurgeon stated, "I am afraid of that spirit —'where is the promise of His coming? etc. etc.' And to pronounce 'all prophets as liars' came to me exceedingly harsh; yea, more than that, it was calculated, I feared, to influence thousands of minds, and lead them in a wrong direction."

It's not that Spurgeon didn't value prophesy, quite the contrary.  He just saw it as a secondary matter to the Gospel; a valuable endeavor, but one which should never "overlay the commonplaces of practical godliness," or start before "first you see to it that your children are brought to the saviour's feet."

Salvation is a theme for which I would fain enlist every holy tongue. I am greedy after witnesses for the glorious gospel of the blessed God. O that Christ crucified were the universal burden of men of God. Your guess at the number of the beast, your Napoleonic speculations, your conjectures concerning a personal Antichrist —forgive me, I count them but mere bones for dogs; while men are dying, and hell is filling, it seems to me the veriest drivel to be muttering about an Armageddon at Sebastopol or Sadowa or Sedan, and peeping between the folded leaves of destiny to discover the fate of Germany. Blessed are they who read and hear the words of the prophecy of the Revelation, but the like blessing has evidently not fallen on those who pretend to expound it, for generation after generation of them have been proven to be in error by the mere lapse of time, and the present race will follow to the same inglorious sepulcher.
Source: Spurgeon, Lectures, 100

And it goes on like that to this very day.

To me, Revelation is predominantly a book of worship.  I would rather showcase the worship and basically ignore the prophesy.  Like Spurgeon, I would rather be guilty of too little emphasis on the timing of the prophesy than too much.

If we Christians are to be like Jesus, then shouldn't the emphasis on certain topics follow the examples Jesus gave?  For example, Jesus talked about taxes more than eschatology.  So it stands to reason, especially in this day of over-taxing, we have a perfect opportunity to be biblical and speak on this topic more often than the end-times.

Please understand, none of this means Jesus' return is unimportant.  I just means the timing is unimportant.

Only fools and madmen are positive in their interpretations of the Apocalypse.
Source: Spurgeon, The Sword and Trowel, review on B. C. Young's, Short Arguments about the Millennium

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Best Of   Christology   Faith   History   Theology  

Comments [0]

Hoax Spurgeon

There's an article floating around the Internet attributed to Spurgeon that was not written by him.  It is written in a way to make one think "how prophetic" that such a man of God could predict with such clarity the exact outcome of where the church ended up.

If it could stand on its own, that's one thing.  But it just is evil to attribute it to a great preacher like Charles Haddon Spurgeon when it's not, umkay?  I've checked the various Spurgeon archives and found nothing like this.  So the burden of proof is on those who believe he wrote it to produce some evidence.  That's it.  It is not up to me or anyone else to prove a negative.

Anyway, here's the article.

An evil resides in the professed camp of the Lord so gross in its imprudence that the most shortsighted can hardly fail to notice it. During the past few years it has developed at an abnormal rate evil for evil. It has worked like leaven until the whole lump ferments. The devil has seldom done a more clever thing than hinting to the Church that part of their mission is to provide entertainment for the people, with a view to winning them. From speaking out as the Puritans did, the Church has gradually toned down her testimony, then winked at and excused the frivolities of the day. Then she tolerated them in her borders. Now she has adopted them under the plea of reaching the masses.

My first contention is that providing amusement for the people is nowhere spoken of in the Scriptures as a function of the Church. If it is a Christian work why did not Christ speak of it? 'Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.' That is clear enough. So it would have been if He has added, 'and provide amusement for those who do not relish the gospel' No such words, however, are to be found. It did not seem to occur to Him. Then again, 'He gave some apostles, some prophets, some pastors and teachers, for the work of the ministry.' Where do entertainers come in? The Holy Spirit is silent concerning them. Were the prophets persecuted because they amused the people or because they refused? The concert has no martyr roll.

Again, providing amusement is in direct antagonism to the teaching and life of Christ and all His apostles. What was the attitude of the Church to the world? 'Ye are the salt,' not sugar candy—something the world will spit out, not swallow. Short and sharp was the utterance, 'Let the dead bury their dead.' He was in awful earnestness!

Had Christ introduced more of the bright and pleasant elements into His mission, He would have been more popular when they went back, because of the searching nature of His teaching. I do not hear Him say, 'Run after these people, Peter, and tell them we will have a different style of service tomorrow, something short and attractive with little preaching. We will have a pleasant evening for the people. Tell them they will be sure to enjoy it. Be quick, Peter, we must get the people somehow!' Jesus pitied sinners, sighed and wept over them, but never sought to amuse them. In vain will the Epistles be searched to find any trace of the gospel amusement. Their message is, 'Come out, keep out, keep clean out!' Anything approaching fooling is conspicuous by its absence. They had boundless confidence in the gospel and employed no other weapon. After Peter and John were locked up for preaching, the Church had a prayer meeting, but they did not pray, 'Lord grant Thy servants that by a wise and discriminating use of innocent recreation we may show these people how happy we are.' If they ceased not for preaching Christ, they had not time for arranging entertainments. Scattered by persecution, they went everywhere preaching the gospel. They 'turned the world upside down.' That is the difference! Lord, clear the Church of all the rot and rubbish the devil has imposed on her and bring us back to apostolic methods. Lastly, the mission of amusement fails to affect the end desired. It works havoc among young converts. Let the careless and scoffers, who thank God because the Church met them halfway, speak and testify. Let the heavy-laden who found peace through the concert not keep silent! Let the drunkard to whom the dramatic entertainment has been God's link in the chain of their conversion, stand up! There are none to answer. The mission of amusement produces no converts. The need of the hour for today's ministry is believing scholarship joined with earnest spirituality, the one springing from the other as fruit from the root. The need is biblical doctrine, so understood and felt, that it sets men on fire.

By the way, even Karen's grandmother, who is not Internet active in any way, carries this article on her person (in tract format) and hands it out to anyone who seems to enjoy Rock and/or Roll music.  I wrote what could pass as a reply on my previous blog.

   
Click here to download:
Hoax_Spurgeon.zip (757 KB)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Faith   History   Ministry   Reformed   Worship  

Comments [0]

Recursiveism

I really like this comic for some reason, although I know the author is essentially reducing God down to infinite space and time and that is not what I believe.


Source: A Bunch of Rock

I do believe God is infinite but not solely manifest as infinite space and time.  God is more than that.

This comic helps illustrate how it can be hard for some people to believe in God.  The author is saying that if you have a person with above average intelligence, let's call him Randal, who is immortal and has access to infinite space and time, then Randal is indistinguishable from God.

And here, Randal is simulating the visible universe.  He only really needs to simulate what we can see, right?  So only the perceivable chunks.  He also only needs to simulate a chunk of time.  As far as we're concerned, time could have started 10 minutes ago, but we have planted memories from years ago in the simulation.

Randal can even make mistakes.  If he does, he could rewind and try it again, if he wants.  Things can happen in his simulation that he is not fully aware of.  All he's doing is maintaining a simulation that with rules for physics on particles.  He's not necessarily paying attention to everything nor does he have control over everything.  Furthermore, it's just a simulation to him, so he doesn't even have to care if a human or a kangaroo suffers.  It's just simulated deterministic suffering and he's above it all.

But does this idea disprove God?  Not at all.  All it does is push the question back a layer.  Someone created Randal, after all.  You could say the cosmic comic author decided to abstract his creation to a sub-creator, call it an inkling.

If you want to suggest that Randal was created by a super-Randal, ad infinitum, then you've really just decided to replace one unbelievable concept with another.

Which one is easier to believe?  Infinitely abstracted Randals or God?  I'm just saying.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Faith   Humor   Ontology   Theology  

Comments [1]

God's Judgment on America?

If you think God is judging America by appointing Obama and plunging her into financial ruin, you don't understand a few things.

America has just as many resources as ever.  The natural resources and human resources are abundant, it's the man-made financial turmoil that is making everyone wig out right now.  I know it's a big deal when my pastor tells everyone they're going to see hyperinflation which will ultimately herald the anti-christ.

And, Obama is not the anti-christ.  Or, if he is, I don't care.  I am a Christian and my job is to point to Jesus, not some anti-jesus behind every bush.

Nowhere are believers told to watch for the appearance of the anti-christ.  On the contrary, we are told to watch for Jesus Christ.  In Titus 2:13 Paul says we are to live "looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus." Likewise, Peter urges us to "fix our hope completely on the grace to be brought to us at the revelation of Jesus Christ" (1 Peter 1:13).  John completes the apostolic chorus by similarly urging us to "fix our hope on Him" at His appearing (1 John 3:2-3).

God has not abandoned us.  He is right here in the midst of this, along side us.  Our Paraclete to the end.

There is a huge transfer of wealth going on, that is true.  But if we pay attention during the reconstruction, we can do some major good.  If we don't give up and we avoid acting like this is some kind of prophesy, we Christians can do a great amount of good for the glory of God.

It reminds me of the Northridge (California) Earthquake in 1994.  Back then, a wise man told me how God could use this earthquake to move people around.  It had the net effect of placing non-believers in the same house as believers where a lot of good could happen.  Hurricane Katrina has a similar effect.

This economic turmoil has been compared to a natural disaster by a great many people.  It has a lot of similarities.  People are being uprooted, resources are needed.  People need to be loved.  The fact that this turmoil has a human cause doesn't change the fact that there are innocents involved.  Very few of us will encounter anyone who caused this, so we should focus on the innocent.

If you think sub-prime caused this mess, you are mistaken.  Sub-prime was the proverbial "canary in the coal mine."  The human heart was the cause of this mess.  We are experiencing the natural consequence of unbridled greed.  That greed lead to unlimited liquidity, which lead to this mess.

Another cause of this mess is lethargy.  In that way, We The People are to blame.  Although there were people who purposefully directed us into these problems, we sat back and expected Superman or Batman or Ron Paul to step in and fix it.  They are not going to do that.  They can't.

Then again, maybe I think I see lethargy because I don't have a $300k retirement account that went to $250k, then $175k.  That would be pretty stressful to watch if it was happening to me, and I most certainly wouldn't be lethargic.

Even Ron Paul knows the only way out is by active participation of the people in their government.  We have to take an active role and educate ourselves.  Instead, we have let the government go unchecked.  We have to fix that.  If we expect one person or a group of people to take care of us, we'll be right back here in no time.

The only exception to what I said about not expecting one man to fix everything is Jesus.  When Jesus comes back to judge the living and the dead, all bets are off.  I have put my faith in that one man and I have no doubt He'll come through.  But until then, we have a role to play in taking back our life, liberty, and private property.  Join me.

By the way, a lot of people are confused by this rapture event.  It's related to Jesus coming back to judge the living and the dead, but probably not what a lot of you've been taught.  Here's a quick explanation of the rapture in less than two minutes:

  
(download)

Learn more ...

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Best Of   Christology   Economic   Faith   Political  

Comments [14]